On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 05:23:05PM +0800, yang.yang29@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Yang Yang <yang.yang29@xxxxxxxxxx> > > After we implemented workingset detection for anonymous LRU[1], > the calculation of workingset size is a little complex. Actually there is > no need to call mem_cgroup_get_nr_swap_pages() if refault page is > anonymous page, since we are doing swapping then should always > give pressure to NR_ACTIVE_ANON. This is false. (mem_cgroup_)get_nr_swap_pages() returns the *free swap slots*. There might be swap, but if it's full, reclaim stops scanning anonymous pages altogether. That means that refaults of either type can no longer displace existing anonymous pages, only cache. So yes, all refaults need to check free swap to determine how to act on the reuse frequency. > @@ -466,22 +466,23 @@ void workingset_refault(struct folio *folio, void *shadow) > /* > * Compare the distance to the existing workingset size. We > * don't activate pages that couldn't stay resident even if > - * all the memory was available to the workingset. Whether > - * workingset competition needs to consider anon or not depends > - * on having swap. > + * all the memory was available to the workingset. For page > + * cache whether workingset competition needs to consider > + * anon or not depends on having swap. No, it applies to all refaults, not just cache. What could help is changing the comment to "having free swap space".
