Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] mm: compaction: Limit the value of interface compact_memory

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 10:54:31PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 3/8/23 20:57, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 11:23:45AM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> >> >  {
> >> > -	if (write)
> >> > +	int ret;
> >> > +
> >> > +	ret = proc_dointvec_minmax(table, write, buffer, length, ppos);
> >> > +	if (ret)
> >> > +		return ret;
> >> > +	if (write) {
> >> > +		pr_info("compact_nodes start\n");
> >> >  		compact_nodes();
> >> > +		pr_info("compact_nodes end\n");
> >> 
> >> I'm not sure we want to start spamming the dmesg. This would make sense
> >> if we wanted to deprecate the sysctl and start hunting for remaining
> >> callers to be fixed. Otherwise ftrace can be used to capture e.g. the time.
> > 
> > Without that print, I don't think a custom proc handler is needed too,
> > right? So what would simplify the code.
> 
> But we'd still call compact_nodes(), so that's not possible without a custom
> handler, no?

Ah right. It does beg the question if that form is common, so to define one.
But that's just extra work not needed now.

  Luis




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux