Re: [RFC 0/6] uprobes: kill uprobes_srcu/uprobe_srcu_id

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/20, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
>
> Yes, We install breakpoints unconditionally, I think we had already
> discussed this and Oleg had proposed a solution too.
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2011/6/16/470 where we move the mm struct from task
> struct to signal struct.

Yes, this too.

Hmm. May be we can do something else? Currently uprobe_consumer->filter()
returns a boolean. Perhaps it can return "yes" || "no" || "remove_bp" ?
But then another uprobe_register(same_addr) should handle this case
somehow. Just a crazy idea, unlikely it makes sense.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]