Re: [PATCHv24 00/16] Contiguous Memory Allocator

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Apr 19, 2012, at 2:40 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:

> On Tue, 03 Apr 2012 16:10:05 +0200
> Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> This is (yet another) update of CMA patches.
> 
> Looks OK to me.  It's a lot of code.
> 
> Please move it into linux-next, and if all is well, ask Linus to pull
> the tree into 3.5-rc1.  Please be sure to cc me on that email.
> 
> I suggest that you include additional patches which enable CMA as much
> as possible on as many architectures as possible so that it gets
> maximum coverage testing in linux-next.  Remove those Kconfig patches
> when merging upstream.
> 
> All this code will probably mess up my tree, but I'll work that out. 
> It would be more awkward if the CMA code were to later disappear from
> linux-next or were not merged into 3.5-rc1.  Let's avoid that.

I'm looking at the patches to see if I can contribute arch support for PPC.

- k

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]