On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 05:15:48PM +0100, Gerald Schaefer wrote: > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h > index b6ba466e2e8a..0bd18de9fd97 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h > @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ static inline bool arch_thp_swp_supported(void) > * fault on one CPU which has been handled concurrently by another CPU > * does not need to perform additional invalidation. > */ > -#define flush_tlb_fix_spurious_fault(vma, address) do { } while (0) > +#define flush_tlb_fix_spurious_fault(vma, address, ptep) do { } while (0) For arm64: Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx> > diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/pgtable.h > index 2c70b4d1263d..c1f6b46ec555 100644 > --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/pgtable.h > +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/pgtable.h > @@ -1239,7 +1239,8 @@ static inline int pte_allow_rdp(pte_t old, pte_t new) > } > > static inline void flush_tlb_fix_spurious_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma, > - unsigned long address) > + unsigned long address, > + pte_t *ptep) > { > /* > * RDP might not have propagated the PTE protection reset to all CPUs, > @@ -1247,11 +1248,12 @@ static inline void flush_tlb_fix_spurious_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma, > * NOTE: This will also be called when a racing pagetable update on > * another thread already installed the correct PTE. Both cases cannot > * really be distinguished. > - * Therefore, only do the local TLB flush when RDP can be used, to avoid > - * unnecessary overhead. > + * Therefore, only do the local TLB flush when RDP can be used, and the > + * PTE does not have _PAGE_PROTECT set, to avoid unnecessary overhead. > + * A local RDP can be used to do the flush. > */ > - if (MACHINE_HAS_RDP) > - asm volatile("ptlb" : : : "memory"); > + if (MACHINE_HAS_RDP && !(pte_val(*ptep) & _PAGE_PROTECT)) > + __ptep_rdp(address, ptep, 0, 0, 1); I wonder whether passing the actual entry is somewhat quicker as it avoids another memory access (though it might already be in the cache). -- Catalin