Re: [PATCH v9 07/18] x86/virt/tdx: Do TDX module per-cpu initialization

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2023-02-15 at 21:37 +0000, Huang, Kai wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-02-15 at 14:25 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 09:46:10AM +0000, Huang, Kai wrote:
> > > Yes agreed.  Your code below looks indeed better.  Thanks!
> > > 
> > > Would you mind send me a patch so I can include to this series, or would you
> > > mind get it merged to tip/x86/tdx (or other branch I am not sure) so I can
> > > rebase?
> > 
> > Just take the patch, add your comments and test it.. enjoy! :-)
> 
> Thank you! I'll at least add your Suggested-by :)

Hi Peter,

After discussing with Kirill, I changed the way of how to handle the per-cpu
initialization, and in the new version (v10, just sent) I don't need the
schedule_on_each_cpu_cond_locked() anymore, because I essentially moved such
handling out of TDX host series to KVM.  I'll use your patch if the review found
we still need to handle it.  Thanks!  




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux