On Fri, 3 Mar 2023 08:58:55 -0800 Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > + for (fg = ZS_INUSE_RATIO_70; fg <= ZS_INUSE_RATIO_99; fg++) > > > + class_almost_full = zs_stat_get(class, fg); > > > + for (fg = ZS_INUSE_RATIO_10; fg < ZS_INUSE_RATIO_70; fg++) > > > + class_almost_empty = zs_stat_get(class, fg); > > > > Aren't these supposed to be += ? > > Looks like they are removed by a following patch anyway. I'll fix that up anyway, to avoid a bisection hole. And in case [patch 4/4] gets dropped from the series or is later reverted or whatever.
