Re: [PATCH 00/17] MODULE_LICENSE removals, sixth tranche

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Nick Alcock <nick.alcock@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/17] MODULE_LICENSE removals, sixth tranche
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2023 14:22:02 -0800
Cc: dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, linux-modules@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20230302211759.30135-1-nick.alcock@oracle.com>
References: <20230302211759.30135-1-nick.alcock@oracle.com>

Stupid question, if you're removing MODULE_LICENSE() than why keep the
other stupid MODULE_*() crap too? If its of no use, be gone!

  Luis

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 00/17] MODULE_LICENSE removals, sixth tranche
  - From: Nick Alcock

References:
- [PATCH 00/17] MODULE_LICENSE removals, sixth tranche
  - From: Nick Alcock

Prev by Date: Re: [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] Cloud storage optimizations
Next by Date: Re: [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] Cloud storage optimizations
Previous by thread: [PATCH 17/17] zswap: remove MODULE_LICENSE in non-modules
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 00/17] MODULE_LICENSE removals, sixth tranche
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Bugtraq] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]

Powered by Linux