On (23/03/02 17:38), Minchan Kim wrote: > > Otherwise I can create two big enums for fullness and stats. > > Let's go with two enums at this moment since your great work is not > tied into the problem. If that becomes really maintaince hole, > we could tidy it up at that time. OK. > > > What's your preference on inuse_0 and inuse_100 naming? Do we > > keep unified naming or should it be INUSE_MIN/INUSE_MAX or > > EMPTY/FULL? > > I don't have strong opinion about it. I will follow your choice. ;-) OK :) > prologue - seq_printf > for (ratio = min, ratio < max; ratio++ ) > seq_printf(s, "%lu", get_stat(ratio) > epilogue - seq_printf > seq_puts(s, "\n"); Let me try a loop.
