On Thu 02-03-23 10:18:31, Valentin Schneider wrote: > On 02/03/23 08:45, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Wed 01-03-23 18:23:19, Valentin Schneider wrote: [...] > >> I want cgroupv1 to die as much as the next person, but in that specific > >> situation I kinda need cgroupv1 to behave somewhat sanely on RT with > >> threshold events :/ > > > > Could you expand on the usecase? > > > > In this case it's just some middleware leveraging memcontrol cgroups and > setting up callbacks for in-cgroup OOM events. This is a supported feature > in cgroupv2, so this isn't a problem of cgroupv1 vs cgroupv2 feature > parity, but rather one of being in a transitional phase where the > middleware itself hasn't fully migrated to using cgroupv2. How is this related to the RT kernel config? memcg OOM vs any RT assumptions do not really get along well AFAICT. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs
