Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] sched/numa: Enhance vma scanning

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/1/2023 9:46 AM, Raghavendra K T wrote:
On 3/1/2023 2:54 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 10:20:18 +0530 Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@xxxxxxx> wrote:

  The patchset proposes one of the enhancements to numa vma scanning
suggested by Mel. This is continuation of [3].

...

  include/linux/mm.h       | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++
  include/linux/mm_types.h |  9 +++++++
  kernel/fork.c            |  2 ++
  kernel/sched/fair.c      | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  mm/memory.c              |  3 +++

It's unclear (to me) which tree would normally carry these.

But there are significant textual conflicts with the "Per-VMA locks"
patchset, and there might be functional issues as well.  So mm.git
would be the better choice.

Please can you redo and retest against tomorrow's mm-unstable branch
(git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm)?  Hopefully the
sched developers can take a look and provide feedback.


Thank you Andrew. Sure will do that.


Thanks again, Sent rebased patches,

Just to record, so that new discussion can happen in new posting

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1677672277.git.raghavendra.kt@xxxxxxx/T/#t






[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux