On 3/1/2023 9:46 AM, Raghavendra K T wrote:
On 3/1/2023 2:54 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 10:20:18 +0530 Raghavendra K T
<raghavendra.kt@xxxxxxx> wrote:
The patchset proposes one of the enhancements to numa vma scanning
suggested by Mel. This is continuation of [3].
...
include/linux/mm.h | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/mm_types.h | 9 +++++++
kernel/fork.c | 2 ++
kernel/sched/fair.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
mm/memory.c | 3 +++
It's unclear (to me) which tree would normally carry these.
But there are significant textual conflicts with the "Per-VMA locks"
patchset, and there might be functional issues as well. So mm.git
would be the better choice.
Please can you redo and retest against tomorrow's mm-unstable branch
(git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm)? Hopefully the
sched developers can take a look and provide feedback.
Thank you Andrew. Sure will do that.
Thanks again, Sent rebased patches,
Just to record, so that new discussion can happen in new posting
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1677672277.git.raghavendra.kt@xxxxxxx/T/#t
