On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 11:13:10AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 10:31:58 +0100 Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Storing build id in file's inode object for elf executable with build
> > id defined. The build id is stored when file is mmaped.
> >
> > This is enabled with new config option CONFIG_INODE_BUILD_ID.
> >
> > The build id is valid only when the file with given inode is mmap-ed.
> >
> > We store either the build id itself or the error we hit during
> > the retrieval.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> > @@ -699,6 +700,12 @@ struct inode {
> > struct fsverity_info *i_verity_info;
> > #endif
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_INODE_BUILD_ID
> > + /* Initialized and valid for executable elf files when mmap-ed. */
> > + struct build_id *i_build_id;
> > + spinlock_t i_build_id_lock;
> > +#endif
> > +
>
> Remember we can have squillions of inodes in memory. So that's one
> costly spinlock!
>
> AFAICT this lock could be removed if mmap_region() were to use an
> atomic exchange on inode->i_build_id?
right, that should work I'll check
>
> If not, can we use an existing lock? i_lock would be appropriate
> (don't forget to update its comment).
ok
>
> Also, the code in mmap_region() runs build_id_free() inside the locked
> region, which seems unnecessary.
>
ok, if the atomic exchange is doable, it'll take care of this
thanks,
jirka
