Re: [PATCH v3 00/35] Per-VMA locks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 24 Feb 2023, freak07 wrote:

Here are some measurements from a Pixel 7 Pro that´s running a kernel either with the Per-VMA locks patchset or without.
If there´s interest I can provide results of other specific apps as well.

Results are from consecutive cold app launches issued with "am start" command spawning the main activity of Slack Android app.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ktujfcyDmIJoQMWsoizGIE-0A_jMS9VMw_seehUY9s0/edit?usp=sharing

There´s quite a noticeable improvement, as can be seen in the graph. The results were reproducible.

Thanks for sharing. I am not surprised - after all, per-vma locks narrow some of the performance gaps
between vanilla and speculative pfs, with less complexity (albeit this is now a 35 patch series :).

Thanks,
Davidlohr





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux