Re: [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] Flexible orders for anonymous folios

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 04:55:20PM -0700, Yu Zhao wrote:
> Currently anonymous folios only support two orders: 0 and the PMD
> order. Flexible orders for anonymous folios can resist both internal
> or external fragmentations when the PMD order is too underutilized or
> costly to allocate. Flexible orders can also leverage the TLB
> coalescing feature, .e.g., order 3 for AMD and order 4 for ARM CPUs.
> 
> Discussion points:
> 1. The page fault path: determining the best order and the fallback policy.
> 2. The reclaim path: detecting the utilization and the splitting policy.
> 3. The refcount and the mapcount models, e.g., reuse the PMD-mapped
> THP model or not.
> 4. The splitting, and the collapsing if needed.
> 5. Other paths: COW, GUP, madvise(), mprotect(), page migration, etc.

6. Swap out an entire folio instead of splitting it before swap.
7. At some point we're going to want Zi Yan's patches to split a folio
   into arbitrary order folios instead of just to order-0.
8. For file folios, folio->index % folio->nr_pages is 0.  Do we want
   to maintain that invariant for anon folios?  It helps tile the
   folios so we don't end up with say, order-0, order-4, order-2 folios
   in a sequence.
9. How do we ensure that two page faults do not overwrite each others
   folios, eg PF1 decides to allocate an order-0 folio at index 6 and
   PF2 decides to allocate an order-2 folio at index 4?

Probably some other things left to decide.

> Now it seems to be a good time to revisit. Yang Shi and I have been
> looking at some details, trying to scope out the work that would be
> required. We don't have anything definitive yet, but we should have
> enough to share by the time of the LSF/MM/BPF.

Excellent.  There are other people also interested in this.  eg:

Ryan Roberts: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/4c991dcb-c5bb-86bb-5a29-05df24429607@xxxxxxx/
Fengwei Yin: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20230109072232.2398464-1-fengwei.yin@xxxxxxxxx/

Obviously I'm keenly interested.
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/Y%2FU8bQd15aUO97vS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

This is definitely worth its own session in the MM track.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux