* Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> [2012-04-14 13:16:37]: > > * Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hello. > > > > Not for inclusion yet, only for the early review. > > Srikar, any objection to these? They look like fine changes to > me in principle, making uprobes less of an overhead to other > kernel subsystems. > I dont have any objections to Oleg's changes. However as Oleg has said, they are currently untested. Once the tracing and perf bits are in -tip, I will add these bits and test them and let you know. Given that I have tested the current bits in -tip several times, I think it might be worthwhile to keep these changes on hold till the current uprobe bits in -tip go upstream. Oleg: Would this be acceptable? -- Thanks and Regards Srikar -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>