Re: [PATCH v5 2/6] ksm: support unsharing zero pages placed by KSM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04.02.23 07:18, yang.yang29@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:

[sorry, was on vacation last week]

Why use flags if they both conditions are mutually exclusive?

Just to make the return value of break_ksm_pmd_entry() more expressive and
understandable. because break_ksm_pmd_entry have three types of returned
values (0, 1, 2).

It adds confusion. Just simplify it please.


MADV_UNMERGEABLE -> unmerge_ksm_pages() will never unshare the shared
zeropage? I thought the patch description mentions that that is one of
the goals?

No, MADV_UNMERGEABLE will trigger KSM to unshare the shared zeropages in the
context of "get_next_rmap_item() -> unshare_zero_pages(), but not directly in the
context of " madvise()-> unmerge_ksm_pages() ". The reason for this is to avoid
increasing long delays of madvise() calling on unsharing zero pages.


Why do we care and make this case special?

--
Thanks,

David / dhildenb





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux