Em Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 03:27:55PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu: > (2012/04/13 0:10), Srikar Dronamraju wrote: > >> $ perf probe libc malloc > >> > >> Makes it even easier to use. > >> > >> Its just when one asks for something that has ambiguities that > >> the tool should ask the user to be a bit more precise to remove such > >> ambiguity. > >> > >> After all... > > Another case > > perf probe do_fork clone_flags now looks for variable clone_flags in > > kernel function do_fork. > > But if we allow to trace perf probe zsh zfree; then > > 'perf probe do_fork clone_flags' should it check for do_fork executable > > or not? If it does check and finds one, and searches for clone_flags > > function and doesnt find, then should it continue with searching the > > kernel? > Agree. I'd like to suggest you to start with only full path support, > and see, how we can handle abbreviations :) Agreed, I was just making usability suggestions. Those can be implemented later, if we agree they ease the tool use. - Arnaldo -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>