February 10, 2023 10:33 AM, "Yajun Deng" <yajun.deng@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> February 10, 2023 10:14 AM, "Zi Yan" <ziy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On 9 Feb 2023, at 20:57, Yajun Deng wrote:
>>
>>> February 9, 2023 11:50 PM, "Zi Yan" <ziy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On 9 Feb 2023, at 5:11, Yajun Deng wrote:
>>> There is no need to execute the next loop if it not return in the first
>>> loop. So add a break at the end of the loop.
>>
>> Can you explain why? If it is the case, MIGRATE_UNMOVABLE cannot fall back
>> to MIGRATE_MOVABLE? And MIGRATE_MOVABLE cannot fall back to MIGRATE_UNMOVABLE?
>> And MIGRATE_RECLAIMABLE cannot fall back to MIGRATE_MOVABLE?
>>> The return in the loop is only related to 'order', 'migratetype' and 'only_stealable'
>>> variables. Even if it execute the next loop, it can't change the result. So the loop
>>> can be broken if the first loop can't return.
>>
>> OK. Got it. Would the code below look better?
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < MIGRATE_PCPTYPES - 1 ; i++) {
>> fallback_mt = fallbacks[migratetype][i];
>> if (free_area_empty(area, fallback_mt))
>> continue;
>> }
>>
>> if (can_steal_fallback(order, migratetype))
>> *can_steal = true;
>>
>> if (!only_stealable || *can_steal)
>> return fallback_mt;
>>
>> return -1;
>
> Yes, I'll submit a v3 patch.
> Thanks.
>
I found a logical error in your code. It should be like this:
for (i = 0; i < MIGRATE_PCPTYPES - 1 ; i++) {
fallback_mt = fallbacks[migratetype][i];
if (!free_area_empty(area, fallback_mt))
break;
}
if (can_steal_fallback(order, migratetype))
*can_steal = true;
if (!only_stealable || *can_steal)
return fallback_mt;
return -1;
This code will modify the logic to the opposite.
So can anyone tell me if I should use this code or the v2 patch?
>>> At the same time, add !migratetype_is_mergeable() before the loop and
>>> reduce the first index size from MIGRATE_TYPES to MIGRATE_PCPTYPES in
>>> fallbacks array.
>>
>> You sent a patch: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230203100132.1627787-1-yajun.deng@xxxxxxxxx/T/#u,
>> why not squash this one into that? Why do
>> we need two separate small patches working on the same code?
>>> Yes, this is better, but I overlooked this one when I sent the first patch. It is already merged.
>>>
>>> As Vlastimil Babka said, reduce the first index from MIGRATE_TYPES to MIGRATE_PCPTYPES may be
>>> cause out of bounds access of the shrinked fallbacks array If we don't judge the range of
>>> migratetype. But this doesn't happen with the second index.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>> Signed-off-by: Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> include/linux/mmzone.h | 2 +-
>>> mm/page_alloc.c | 11 +++++------
>>> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
>>> index ab94985ee7d9..0a817b8c7fb2 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
>>> @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static inline bool is_migrate_movable(int mt)
>>> * Check whether a migratetype can be merged with another migratetype.
>>> *
>>> * It is only mergeable when it can fall back to other migratetypes for
>>> - * allocation. See fallbacks[MIGRATE_TYPES][3] in page_alloc.c.
>>> + * allocation. See fallbacks[][] array in page_alloc.c.
>>> */
>>> static inline bool migratetype_is_mergeable(int mt)
>>> {
>>> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
>>> index 1113483fa6c5..536e8d838fb5 100644
>>> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
>>> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
>>> @@ -2603,7 +2603,7 @@ struct page *__rmqueue_smallest(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order,
>>> *
>>> * The other migratetypes do not have fallbacks.
>>> */
>>> -static int fallbacks[MIGRATE_TYPES][MIGRATE_PCPTYPES - 1] = {
>>> +static int fallbacks[MIGRATE_PCPTYPES][MIGRATE_PCPTYPES - 1] = {
>>> [MIGRATE_UNMOVABLE] = { MIGRATE_RECLAIMABLE, MIGRATE_MOVABLE },
>>> [MIGRATE_MOVABLE] = { MIGRATE_RECLAIMABLE, MIGRATE_UNMOVABLE },
>>> [MIGRATE_RECLAIMABLE] = { MIGRATE_UNMOVABLE, MIGRATE_MOVABLE },
>>> @@ -2861,7 +2861,7 @@ int find_suitable_fallback(struct free_area *area, unsigned int order,
>>> int i;
>>> int fallback_mt;
>>>
>>> - if (area->nr_free == 0)
>>> + if (area->nr_free == 0 || !migratetype_is_mergeable(migratetype))
>>> return -1;
>>>
>>> *can_steal = false;
>>> @@ -2873,11 +2873,10 @@ int find_suitable_fallback(struct free_area *area, unsigned int order,
>>> if (can_steal_fallback(order, migratetype))
>>> *can_steal = true;
>>>
>>> - if (!only_stealable)
>>> - return fallback_mt;
>>> -
>>> - if (*can_steal)
>>> + if (!only_stealable || *can_steal)
>>> return fallback_mt;
>>> + else
>>> + break;
>>> }
>>>
>>> return -1;
>>> --
>>> 2.25.1
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards,
>> Yan, Zi
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards,
>> Yan, Zi
