Re: [RFC PATCH v4 3/4] mm: add do_set_pte_range()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06.02.23 17:33, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 04:13:44PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
The handling of cow pages is still very clunky.
folio_add_new_anon_rmap() handles anonymous large folios just fine.  I
think David was looking at current code, not the code in mm-next.
OK. Let's wait for further comment from David.

As I raised, page_add_new_anon_rmap() -> folio_add_new_anon_rmap() can be
used to add a fresh (a) PMD-mapped THP or (b) order-0 folio.

folio_add_new_anon_rmap() is not suitable for PTE-mapping a large folio.
Which is what we are intending to do here unless I am completely off.

I think you are.  While the infrastructure here handles large folios
which are not PMDs, there's nobody who will allocate such a thing, so
there is no problem.  Right>

And that's precisely what I want to have fenced off here. I want that function to complain instead of silently doing the wrong thing.

--
Thanks,

David / dhildenb





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux