On 04/11/2012 06:00 PM, Ying Han wrote:
1. If soft_limit are all set to MAX, it wastes first three periority iterations without scanning anything. 2. By default every memcg is eligibal for softlimit reclaim, and we can also set the value to MAX for special memcg which is immune to soft limit reclaim. This idea is based on discussion with Michal and Johannes from LSF.
Combined with patch 2/5, would this not result in always returning "reclaim from this memcg" for groups without a configured softlimit, while groups with a configured softlimit only get reclaimed from when they are over their limit? Is that the desired behaviour when a system has some cgroups with a configured softlimit, and some without? -- All rights reversed -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>