On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 04/11/2012 12:38 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: >> >> Lumpy reclaim had a purpose but in the mind of some, it was to kick >> the system so hard it trashed. For others the purpose was to complicate >> vmscan.c. Over time it was giving softer shoes and a nicer attitude but >> memory compaction needs to step up and replace it so this patch sends >> lumpy reclaim to the farm. >> >> The tracepoint format changes for isolating LRU pages with this patch >> applied. Furthermore reclaim/compaction can no longer queue dirty pages in >> pageout() if the underlying BDI is congested. Lumpy reclaim used this >> logic >> and reclaim/compaction was using it in error. >> >> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman<mgorman@xxxxxxx> > > Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>