Re: [PATCH 01/18] lib/stackdepot: fix setting next_slab_inited in init_stack_slab

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 1:18 AM Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 30 Jan 2023 21:49:25 +0100 andrey.konovalov@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> > In commit 305e519ce48e ("lib/stackdepot.c: fix global out-of-bounds in
> > stack_slabs"), init_stack_slab was changed to only use preallocated
> > memory for the next slab if the slab number limit is not reached.
> > However, setting next_slab_inited was not moved together with updating
> > stack_slabs.
> >
> > Set next_slab_inited only if the preallocated memory was used for the
> > next slab.
>
> Please provide a full description of the user-visible runtime effects
> of the bug (always always).
>
> I'll add the cc:stable (per your comments in the [0/N] cover letter),
> but it's more reliable to add it to the changelog yourself.

Right, will do this next time.

> As to when I upstream this: don't know - that depends on the
> user-visible-effects thing.

Looks like there's no bug to fix after all as per comments by Alexander.

Thanks!




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux