Re: [PATCHv24 00/16] Contiguous Memory Allocator

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>
>> This is (yet another) update of CMA patches.
>
>
> How well CMA is supposed to work if you have mlocked processes? I've
> been testing these patches, and noticed that by creating a small mlocked
> process you start to get plenty of test_pages_isolated() failure warnings,
> and bigger allocations will always fail.

CMIIW, I think mlocked pages are never migrated. The reason is because
__isolate_lru_pages() does not isolate Unevictable pages right now.

Minchan added support to allow this but the patch was dropped.

See the discussion at : https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/29/295

Sandeep

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]