Re: [PATCH] mm/highmem: Align-down to page the address for kunmap_flush_on_unmap()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:

FWIW I think I would simplify the subject
[PATCH] mm/highmem: Fix kunmap_local() on flush on unmap architectures

Or something like that.

> If ARCH_HAS_FLUSH_ON_KUNMAP is defined (PA-RISC case), __kunmap_local()
> calls kunmap_flush_on_unmap(). The latter currently flushes the wrong
> address (as confirmed by Matthew Wilcox and Helge Deller). Al Viro
> proposed to call kunmap_flush_on_unmap() on an aligned-down to page
> address in order to fix this issue. Consensus has been reached on this
> solution.
> 
> Therefore, if ARCH_HAS_FLUSH_ON_KUNMAP is defined, call
> kunmap_flush_on_unmap() on an aligned-down to page address computed with
> the PTR_ALIGN_DOWN() macro.
> 
> Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Suggested-by: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Confirmed-by: Helge Deller <deller@xxxxxx>
> Confirmed-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Fixes: f3ba3c710ac5 ("mm/highmem: Provide kmap_local*")
> Signed-off-by: Fabio M. De Francesco <fmdefrancesco@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> 
> I have (at least) two problems with this patch...
> 
> 1) checkpatch.pl complains about the use of the non-standard
> "Confirmed-by" tags. I don't know how else I can give credit to Helge
> and Matthew. However, this is not the first time that I see non-standard
> tags in patches applied upstream (I too had a non-standard
> "Analysed-by" tag in patch which fixes a SAC bug). Any objections?

I think you can add Matthew and Helge as Suggested-by:  All 3 had input on
the solution.

> 
> 2) I'm not sure whether or not the "Fixes" tag is appropriate in this
> patch. Can someone either confirm or deny it?

This 'fixes' looks correct to me.  I don't know how many folks are running
highmem with parisc but if they are I am sure they would appreciate the
extra knowledge.

I do wonder if this should be cc'ed to stable to ensure it gets
backported?  Helge do you think there is a need for that?

Ira

> 
>  include/linux/highmem-internal.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/highmem-internal.h b/include/linux/highmem-internal.h
> index 034b1106d022..e247c9ac4583 100644
> --- a/include/linux/highmem-internal.h
> +++ b/include/linux/highmem-internal.h
> @@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ static inline void *kmap_local_pfn(unsigned long pfn)
>  static inline void __kunmap_local(const void *addr)
>  {
>  #ifdef ARCH_HAS_FLUSH_ON_KUNMAP
> -	kunmap_flush_on_unmap(addr);
> +	kunmap_flush_on_unmap(PTR_ALIGN_DOWN(addr, PAGE_SIZE));
>  #endif
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.39.0
> 
> 




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux