On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 09:21:51AM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > Seems like the wording is confusing me, so I write the improv: > > > > ---- >8 ---- > > diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-kernel-mm-ksm b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-kernel-mm-ksm > > index 7768e90f7a8fef..5309a912ab679b 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-kernel-mm-ksm > > +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-kernel-mm-ksm > > @@ -56,6 +56,6 @@ What: /sys/kernel/mm/ksm/general_profit > > Date: January 2023 > > KernelVersion: 6.1 > > Contact: Linux memory management mailing list <linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx> > > -Description: Measure how effective KSM is. > > - general_profit: how effective is KSM. The formula for the > > - calculation is in Documentation/admin-guide/mm/ksm.rst. > > +Description: Measure the KSM profit. See > > + :ref:`KSM documentation <monitoring-ksm-profit>` for details > > + on the calculated formula. > > So the original at least attempted to tell us what "KSM profit" is; the > "improved" version makes no such effort. I don't think that is actually > better. I overlooked that, thanks! -- An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
