On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 12:39:42PM +0900, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote: > In workloads where this_cpu operations are frequently performed, > enabling DEBUG_PREEMPT may result in significant increase in > runtime overhead due to frequent invocation of > __this_cpu_preempt_check() function. > > This can be demonstrated through benchmarks such as hackbench where this > configuration results in a 10% reduction in performance, primarily due to > the added overhead within memcg charging path. > > Therefore, do not to enable DEBUG_PREEMPT by default and make users aware > of its potential impact on performance in some workloads. > > hackbench-process-sockets > debug_preempt no_debug_preempt > Amean 1 0.4743 ( 0.00%) 0.4295 * 9.45%* > Amean 4 1.4191 ( 0.00%) 1.2650 * 10.86%* > Amean 7 2.2677 ( 0.00%) 2.0094 * 11.39%* > Amean 12 3.6821 ( 0.00%) 3.2115 * 12.78%* > Amean 21 6.6752 ( 0.00%) 5.7956 * 13.18%* > Amean 30 9.6646 ( 0.00%) 8.5197 * 11.85%* > Amean 48 15.3363 ( 0.00%) 13.5559 * 11.61%* > Amean 79 24.8603 ( 0.00%) 22.0597 * 11.27%* > Amean 96 30.1240 ( 0.00%) 26.8073 * 11.01%* > > Signed-off-by: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@xxxxxxxxx> Nice! I checkout my very simple kmem performance test (1M allocations 8-bytes allocations) and it shows ~30% difference: 112319 us with vs 80836 us without. Probably not that big for real workloads, but still nice to have. Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@xxxxxxxxx> Thank you!
