On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 4:28 PM Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 15:35:49 -0800 Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > --- a/include/linux/mm_types.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h
> > @@ -491,7 +491,15 @@ struct vm_area_struct {
> > * See vmf_insert_mixed_prot() for discussion.
> > */
> > pgprot_t vm_page_prot;
> > - unsigned long vm_flags; /* Flags, see mm.h. */
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Flags, see mm.h.
> > + * To modify use {init|reset|set|clear|mod}_vm_flags() functions.
> > + */
> > + union {
> > + const vm_flags_t vm_flags;
> > + vm_flags_t __private __vm_flags;
> > + };
>
> Typically when making a change like this we'll rename the affected
> field/variable/function/etc. This will reliably and deliberately break
> unconverted usage sites.
>
> This const trick will get us partway there, by breaking setters. But
> renaming it will break both setters and getters.
My intent here is to break setters but to allow getters to keep
reading vma->vm_flags directly. We could provide get_vm_flags() and
convert all getters as well but it would introduce a huge additional
churn (800+ hits) with no obvious benefits, I think. Does that clarify
the intent of this trick?
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kernel-team+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx.
>
