On Fri, 2023-01-20 at 11:19 -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 05:27:30PM +0000, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote: > > On Thu, 2023-01-19 at 14:26 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > On Thu, 19 Jan 2023 13:22:38 -0800 Rick Edgecombe < > > > rick.p.edgecombe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > SHSTK > > > > > > Sounds like me trying to swear in Russian while drunk. > > > > > > Is there any chance of s/shstk/shadow_stack/g? > > > > I'm fine with the name change. I think shstk got debated and picked > > early in the history of the series before I got involved. "shstk" > > is > > nice and short, but it's not completely clear what it is unless you > > already know about shadow stack. So there is a tradeoff of clarity > > and > > line length/wrapping. Does anyone else have any strong opinions? > > I prefer SHSTK because it specifically means x86's hardware shadow > stack from CET. Lots of things can (and have) implemented things > called > "shadow stack". This makes sense to, especially if we can hide it more from the core-mm code per David Hildebrand's suggestion. I guess I'll leave it for now unless anyone else has a stronger opinion.
