Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] Fixes for kmemleak tracking with CMA regions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 24 Jan 2023 15:48:57 +0000 Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> Thanks for digging this out. This patch shouldn't have ended up upstream
> (commit 972fa3a7c17c "mm: kmemleak: alloc gray object for reserved
> region with direct map"). I thought both Calvin Zhang and I agreed that
> it's not the correct approach (not even sure there was a real problem to
> fix).
> 
> Do you still get the any faults with the above commit reverted? I'd
> prefer this if it works rather than adding unnecessary
> kmemleak_alloc/free callbacks that pretty much cancel each-other.
> 
> > I'm not sure if that commit is appropriate, given that reserved regions
> > that still have their direct mappings intact may be used for DMA, which
> > isn't appropriate for kmemleak scanning.
> 
> It's not. I think it should be reverted.

Could someone please send along a patch to revert this, along
with the explanation for doing so?  And please consider a cc:stable.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux