Re: [PATCH v8 10/10] mm: Renumber FOLL_PIN and FOLL_GET down

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 05:18:07AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 09:13:30AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > Yeah, I already wrote a similar patch, using the 1<< notation, 
> > splitting the internal/external, and rebasing on the move to
> > mm_types.. I can certainly drop that patch if we'd rather do this.
> 
> Given that you are doing more work in that area it might be best
> to drop this patch from this series.
> 
> > Though, I'm not so keen on using FOLL_ internal flags inside the block
> > layer.. Can you stick with the BIO versions of these?
> 
> The block layer doesn't really use it - the new helper in iov_iter.c
> returns it, and the block layer instantly turns it into an internal
> flag.  But maybe it should just return a bool pinned (by reference)
> now?

Yes, a bool flag to the new mm helper instead of a FOLL_* seems good
to me

Thanks,
Jason




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux