On Monday 09 April 2012, 정효진 wrote: > If swap system use 512KB page and issue Discard/Trim align with 512KB, eMMC make best > performance as of today. However, large page size in swap partition may not best way > in Linux system level. > I'm not sure that the best page size between Swap system and eMMC device. Can you explain the significance of the 512KB size? I've seen devices report 512KB erase size, although measurements clearly showed an erase block size of 8MB and I do not understand this discprepancy. Right now, we always send discards of 1MB clusters to the device, which does what you want, although I'm not sure if those clusters are naturally aligned to the start of the partition. Obviously this also requires aligning the start of the partition to the erase block size, but most devices should already get that right nowadays. Arnd -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>