Re: [PATCH v6 2/5] lazy tlb: allow lazy tlb mm refcounting to be configurable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 1/23/23 9:35 AM, Nadav Amit wrote:
+    if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MMU_LAZY_TLB_REFCOUNT)) {
+        mmdrop(mm);
+    } else {
+        /*
+         * mmdrop_lazy_tlb must provide a full memory barrier, see the
+         * membarrier comment finish_task_switch which relies on this.
+         */
+        smp_mb();
+    }
  }

Considering the fact that mmdrop_lazy_tlb() replaced mmdrop() in various locations in which smp_mb() was not required, this comment might be confusing. IOW, for the cases in most cases where mmdrop_lazy_tlb() replaced mmdrop(), this comment was irrelevant, and therefore it now becomes confusing.

I am not sure the include the smp_mb() here instead of "open-coding" it helps.
I think that I now understand why you do need the smp_mb() here, so ignore my comment.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux