Re: [PATCHv4 2/2] mm: use stack_depot_early_init for kmemleak

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/19/23 23:42, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jan 2023 11:32:36 +0100 Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx> wrote:

But to be cleaner I'd also suggest Andrew adds the hunk below. The call
to stack_depot_init() becomes no-op after this patch so it's not a bug
to leave it there, but it's just misleading now.

---8<---
diff --git a/mm/kmemleak.c b/mm/kmemleak.c
index 91dda5c2753a..55dc8b8b0616 100644
--- a/mm/kmemleak.c
+++ b/mm/kmemleak.c
@@ -2095,7 +2095,6 @@ void __init kmemleak_init(void)
  	if (kmemleak_error)
  		return;
- stack_depot_init();
  	jiffies_min_age = msecs_to_jiffies(MSECS_MIN_AGE);
  	jiffies_scan_wait = msecs_to_jiffies(SECS_SCAN_WAIT * 1000);

I added your signoff to this.

Fine with me, thanks.

I used not to bother for such minor to-be-folded fixups, but now
Stephen sends me automated nags when his scripts detect this.

Ack, will try to remember that next time.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux