On 04/06/2012 07:37 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 5 Apr 2012 16:35:30 -0700
Andrew Morton<akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 6 Mar 2012 20:12:23 +0800
Sha Zhengju<handai.szj@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Sha Zhengju<handai.szj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Index current_threshold should point to threshold just below or equal to usage.
See below:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/cgroups/msg00844.html
I have a bad feeling that I looked at a version of this patch
yesterday, but I can't find it.
Found it! Below.
I think we might as well fold "memcg: revise the position of threshold
index while unregistering event" into the below "memcg: make threshold
index in the right position" as a single patch?
Yeah, actually I've already sent a folded one before(maybe I should
mark it as V2):
http://www.spinics.net/lists/cgroups/msg01133.html
Thanks,
Sha
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>