Re: remove write_one_page / folio_write_one

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 04:32:16PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 02:00:42PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 09:16:53AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 08:53:09PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> > > > The btrfs patches were sent separately some time ago, now merged to
> > > > misc-next with updated changelogs and with the suggested switch to folio
> > > > API in the 2nd patch.
> > > 
> > > Yes, 7 weeks ago to be exact.  I wish we could just feed everything
> > > together now that we've missed the previous merge window, as that
> > > makes patch juggling for Andrew and Matthew a lot simpler.
> > 
> > The patches are not fixes so they should wait for the next merge window.
> 
> Agreed.  But it would be a lot simpler if we could queue them up in
> -mm with the other patches now that we've missed the previous merge
> window.

Ok then, to make it easier for the folio changes I'll send the two btrfs
patches next week. As the rest of the series does not depend on it,
I don't see the need to let them all go via the mm tree.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux