Re: [PATCH 08/41] mm: introduce CONFIG_PER_VMA_LOCK

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 4:39 PM Davidlohr Bueso <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 09 Jan 2023, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
>
> >This configuration variable will be used to build the support for VMA
> >locking during page fault handling.
> >
> >This is enabled by default on supported architectures with SMP and MMU
> >set.
> >
> >The architecture support is needed since the page fault handler is called
> >from the architecture's page faulting code which needs modifications to
> >handle faults under VMA lock.
>
> I don't think that per-vma locking should be something that is user-configurable.
> It should just be depdendant on the arch. So maybe just remove CONFIG_PER_VMA_LOCK?

Thanks for the suggestion! I would be happy to make that change if
there are no objections. I think the only pushback might have been the
vma size increase but with the latest optimization in the last patch
maybe that's less of an issue?

>
> Thanks,
> Davidlohr
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kernel-team+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx.
>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux