Hi Liam,
On Thu, 5 Jan 2023 19:16:00 +0000 Liam Howlett <liam.howlett@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Prepare for the removal of the vma_mas_store() function by open coding
> the maple tree store in this test code.
But seems this series is not really removing 'vma_mas_store()'. Wouldn't it
better to do the preparation and removal together in a same patch series?
> Set the range of the maple
> state and call the store function directly.
>
> Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: damon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> mm/damon/vaddr-test.h | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/damon/vaddr-test.h b/mm/damon/vaddr-test.h
> index bce37c487540..41532f7355d0 100644
> --- a/mm/damon/vaddr-test.h
> +++ b/mm/damon/vaddr-test.h
> @@ -24,8 +24,10 @@ static void __link_vmas(struct maple_tree *mt, struct vm_area_struct *vmas,
> return;
>
> mas_lock(&mas);
> - for (i = 0; i < nr_vmas; i++)
> - vma_mas_store(&vmas[i], &mas);
> + for (i = 0; i < nr_vmas; i++) {
> + mas_set_range(&mas, vmas[i].vm_start, vmas[i].vm_end - 1);
> + mas_store_gfp(&mas, &vmas[i], GFP_KERNEL);
> + }
On the latest mm-unstable, vma_mas_store() uses mas_store_prealloc() instead of
mas_store_gfp(). Seems the difference would make no problem to this test code
in most cases, but could I ask the reason for this change?
Also, should we check the return value of mas_store_gfp()?
> mas_unlock(&mas);
> }
>
> --
> 2.35.1
Thanks,
SJ
