[TLDR: This mail in primarily relevant for Linux kernel regression
tracking. See link in footer if these mails annoy you.]
On 22.12.22 13:06, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> [Note: this mail contains only information for Linux kernel regression
> tracking. Mails like these contain '#forregzbot' in the subject to make
> then easy to spot and filter out. The author also tried to remove most
> or all individuals from the list of recipients to spare them the hassle.]
>
> On 13.12.22 11:26, Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink) wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> The latest mainline kernel branch fails to build xtensa allmodconfig
>> with gcc-11 with the error:
>>
>> kernel/kcsan/kcsan_test.c: In function '__report_matches':
>> kernel/kcsan/kcsan_test.c:257:1: error: the frame size of 1680 bytes is larger than 1536 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=]
>> 257 | }
>> | ^
>>
>> git bisect pointed to e240e53ae0ab ("mm, slub: add CONFIG_SLUB_TINY")
>
> Thanks for the report. To be sure below issue doesn't fall through the
> cracks unnoticed, I'm adding it to regzbot, my Linux kernel regression
> tracking bot:
>
> #regzbot ^introduced e240e53ae0ab
> #regzbot title mm, slub: CONFIG_SLUB_TINY causes various build errors
> #regzbot ignore-activity
#regzbot fix: kcsan: test: don't put the expect array on the stack
Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
--
Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking:
https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr
If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page.
