Re: [PATCH] mm/memory_failure: Let the compiler add the function name

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 11:09:09AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > I agree with your change, but I'm not sure these should be pr_info() to 
> > start with, these seem more like debugging messages?  I can't see how 
> > they'd be useful in standard operation so could we just convert them to be 
> > debug instead?
> 
> Well it tells why the page recovery didn't work.
> 
> Memory recovery is a somewhat obscure path, so it's better to have
> full information.

Nod, and it won't disturb the users unless something really bad happens.

I'm fine with the patch, too.

Thanks,
Fengguang

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]