Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] mm: vmalloc: Avoid of calling __find_vmap_area() twise in __vunmap()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> A sorry.  I need more coffee, this is not the cover letter, but the
> patch that introduceѕ find_unlink_vmap_area.
> 
Sorry. I should post it with a cover latter to make it less confusing.

> > -	spin_lock(&vmap_area_lock);
> > -	unlink_va(va, &vmap_area_root);
> > -	spin_unlock(&vmap_area_lock);
> > +	if (!list_empty(&va->list)) {
> > +		spin_lock(&vmap_area_lock);
> > +		unlink_va(va, &vmap_area_root);
> > +		spin_unlock(&vmap_area_lock);
> > +	}
> 
> As mentioned before, I'd much rather move this into the callers.
> 
Agree. There is only one caller, it is the free_vmap_block().
Will fix in the v3.

> > +	va = find_unlink_vmap_area((unsigned long) addr);
> > +	return __remove_vm_area(va);
> 
> This can drop the va local variable now.
>
Do you mean like:

struct vm_struct *remove_vm_area(const void *addr)
{
    might_sleep();
    return __remove_vm_area(
        find_unlink_vmap_area((unsigned long) addr));
}

?

Thanks for review!

--
Uladzislau Rezki




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux