On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 03:05:52PM +0000, Liam Howlett wrote: > * Vernon Yang <vernon2gm@xxxxxxxxx> [221220 09:26]: > > Invert the conditional judgment of the mid_split, to focus > > the return statement in the last statement, which is easier > > to understand and for better readability. > > > > Signed-off-by: Vernon Yang <vernon2gm@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > lib/maple_tree.c | 5 ++--- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/lib/maple_tree.c b/lib/maple_tree.c > > index 16cdcf309e97..d147669fb99c 100644 > > --- a/lib/maple_tree.c > > +++ b/lib/maple_tree.c > > @@ -1882,10 +1882,9 @@ static inline int mab_calc_split(struct ma_state *mas, > > > > /* Avoid ending a node on a NULL entry */ > > split = mab_no_null_split(bn, split, slot_count); > > - if (!(*mid_split)) > > - return split; > > > > - *mid_split = mab_no_null_split(bn, *mid_split, slot_count); > > + if (*mid_split) > > + *mid_split = mab_no_null_split(bn, *mid_split, slot_count); > > The function is written this way because mid_split is almost always > zero. If you want to change this, then we should add an unlikely() to > the if statement. Okay，thank you very much for the suggestion, I will add an unlikely() to the if statement. > > > > > return split; > > } > > -- > > 2.34.1 > > > >
