* Vernon Yang <vernon2gm@xxxxxxxxx> [221220 09:26]:
> The return value of mas_commit_b_node() function represents whether
> the submit b_node is successful, and can only be false and true, so
> the return value type is bool is more appropriate and for better
> readability.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vernon Yang <vernon2gm@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> lib/maple_tree.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/maple_tree.c b/lib/maple_tree.c
> index b3a215dd961e..e7dde4a1d6cb 100644
> --- a/lib/maple_tree.c
> +++ b/lib/maple_tree.c
> @@ -3578,7 +3578,7 @@ static inline bool mas_reuse_node(struct ma_wr_state *wr_mas,
> * @b_node: The maple big node
> * @end: The end of the data.
> */
> -static inline int mas_commit_b_node(struct ma_wr_state *wr_mas,
> +static inline bool mas_commit_b_node(struct ma_wr_state *wr_mas,
> struct maple_big_node *b_node, unsigned char end)
mas_commit_b_node() can also return the ints from mas_split() and
mas_rebalance(). I'm fine with changing the return, but it seems odd to
only half-change it?
Initially I had a different intention for the return type of int, but it
seems the return isn't used at all from this function. We should
just change mas_commit_b_node(), mas_split(), and mas_rebalance() to
return type void if we're going to clean it up.
> {
> struct maple_node *node;
> @@ -3598,7 +3598,7 @@ static inline int mas_commit_b_node(struct ma_wr_state *wr_mas,
>
> mas_node_count(wr_mas->mas, 1);
> if (mas_is_err(wr_mas->mas))
> - return 0;
> + return false;
>
> node = mas_pop_node(wr_mas->mas);
> node->parent = mas_mn(wr_mas->mas)->parent;
> @@ -3607,7 +3607,7 @@ static inline int mas_commit_b_node(struct ma_wr_state *wr_mas,
> mas_replace(wr_mas->mas, false);
> reuse_node:
> mas_update_gap(wr_mas->mas);
> - return 1;
> + return true;
> }
>
> /*
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
