On 12/12/22 17:16, Tejun Heo wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 01:59:53PM +0100, Michal Koutný wrote:
Hello.
On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 05:20:57PM -0500, Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Before commit 3b8cc6298724 ("blk-cgroup: Optimize blkcg_rstat_flush()"),
blkg's stats is only flushed if they are online.
I'm not sure I follow -- css_release_work_fn/cgroup_rstat_flush may be
called on an offlined blkcg (offlined!=released). There's no invariant
ensuring offlined blkcg won't be flushed. (There is only current
situation when there is no reader of io data that'd need them flushed
[1].)
In addition, the stat flushing of blkgs in blkcg_rstat_flush()
includes propagating the rstat data to its parent. However, if a blkg
has been destroyed (offline), the validity of its parent may be
questionable.
Parents won't be freed (neither offlined) before children (see
css_killed_work_fn). It should be regularly OK to pass data into a
parent of an offlined blkcg.
For safety, revert back to the old behavior by ignoring offline
blkg's.
I don't know if this is a good reasoning. If you argue that offlined
children needn't be taken into parent's account, then I think it's more
efficient to exclude the offlined blkcgs from update. (With the caveat I
have in [1].)
Yeah, I'm not sure about this patch either. Doesn't seem necessary.
I wrote this patch because I am not totally sure it is safe to flush
offline blkgs. Since both you and Michal don't see any problem with it.
I am fine taking it out.
Cheers,
Longman
