On Tue 06-12-22 18:13:38, Johannes Weiner wrote: > New series based on the discussion in the previous thread around > getting lock_page_memcg() out of rmap. > > I beat on this with concurrent high-frequency moving of tasks that > partially share a swapped out shmem file. I didn't spot anything > problematic. That said, it is quite subtle, and Hugh, I'd feel better > if you could also subject it to your torture suite ;) For the whole series Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx> Thanks! > > Thanks! > > Against yesterday's mm-unstable. > > Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/memory.rst | 11 ++++- > mm/memcontrol.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++------ > mm/rmap.c | 26 ++++------- > 3 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) > -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs
