Cleanup comment in the case find_idlest_cpu returned -1 and check for
< 0 instead of == -1 as it should allow gcc to generate more optimal
code.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 5 ++---
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index a8498e0..0c60f46 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -2792,10 +2792,9 @@ select_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int sd_flag, int wake_flags)
if (new_cpu == -1 || new_cpu == cpu) {
/* Now try balancing at a lower domain level of cpu */
sd = sd->child;
- if (new_cpu == -1) {
- /* Only for certain that new cpu is valid */
+ if (new_cpu < 0)
+ /* Return prev_cpu is find_idlest_cpu failed */
new_cpu = prev_cpu;
- }
continue;
}
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>