Re: [PATCH 11/39] autonuma: CPU follow memory algorithm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 19:45 +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> @@ -3220,6 +3214,8 @@ need_resched:
>  
>         post_schedule(rq);
>  
> +       sched_autonuma_balance();
> +
>         sched_preempt_enable_no_resched();
>         if (need_resched())
>                 goto need_resched; 

I already told you, this isn't ever going to happen. You do _NOT_ put a
for_each_online_cpu() loop in the middle of schedule().

You also do not call stop_one_cpu(migration_cpu_stop) in schedule to
force migrate the task you just scheduled to away from this cpu. That's
retarded.

Nacked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]