Re: [PATCH 09/10] mm/hugetlb: Make page_vma_mapped_walk() safe to pmd unshare

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 29.11.22 20:35, Peter Xu wrote:
Since page_vma_mapped_walk() walks the pgtable, it needs the vma lock
to make sure the pgtable page will not be freed concurrently.

Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  include/linux/rmap.h | 4 ++++
  mm/page_vma_mapped.c | 5 ++++-
  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/rmap.h b/include/linux/rmap.h
index bd3504d11b15..a50d18bb86aa 100644
--- a/include/linux/rmap.h
+++ b/include/linux/rmap.h
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
  #include <linux/highmem.h>
  #include <linux/pagemap.h>
  #include <linux/memremap.h>
+#include <linux/hugetlb.h>
/*
   * The anon_vma heads a list of private "related" vmas, to scan if
@@ -408,6 +409,9 @@ static inline void page_vma_mapped_walk_done(struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw)
  		pte_unmap(pvmw->pte);
  	if (pvmw->ptl)
  		spin_unlock(pvmw->ptl);
+	/* This needs to be after unlock of the spinlock */
+	if (is_vm_hugetlb_page(pvmw->vma))
+		hugetlb_vma_unlock_read(pvmw->vma);
  }
bool page_vma_mapped_walk(struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw);
diff --git a/mm/page_vma_mapped.c b/mm/page_vma_mapped.c
index 93e13fc17d3c..f94ec78b54ff 100644
--- a/mm/page_vma_mapped.c
+++ b/mm/page_vma_mapped.c
@@ -169,10 +169,13 @@ bool page_vma_mapped_walk(struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw)
  		if (pvmw->pte)
  			return not_found(pvmw);
+ hugetlb_vma_lock_read(vma);
  		/* when pud is not present, pte will be NULL */
  		pvmw->pte = huge_pte_offset(mm, pvmw->address, size);
-		if (!pvmw->pte)
+		if (!pvmw->pte) {
+			hugetlb_vma_unlock_read(vma);
  			return false;
+		}
pvmw->ptl = huge_pte_lock(hstate, mm, pvmw->pte);
  		if (!check_pte(pvmw))

Looking at code like mm/damon/paddr.c:__damon_pa_mkold() and reading the doc of page_vma_mapped_walk(), this might be broken.

Can't we get page_vma_mapped_walk() called multiple times? Wouldn't we have to remember that we already took the lock to not lock twice, and to see if we really have to unlock in page_vma_mapped_walk_done() ?

--
Thanks,

David / dhildenb





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux