Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/6] execmem_alloc for BPF programs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 07:28:36PM -0700, Song Liu wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 1:12 PM Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Also, you mention your perf stats are run on a VM, I am curious what
> > things you need to get TLB to be properly measured on the VM and if
> > this is really reliable data Vs bare metal. I haven't yet been sucessful
> > on getting perf stat for TBL to work on a VM and based on what I've read
> > have been catious about the results.
> 
> To make these perf counters work on VM, we need a newer host kernel
> (my system is running 5.6 based kernel, but I am not sure what is the
> minimum required version). Then we need to run qemu with option
> "-cpu host" (both host and guest are x86_64).
> 
> >
> > So curious if you'd see something different on bare metal.
> 
> Once the above all worked out, VM runs the same as bare metal from
> perf counter's point of view.

TLBs behave differently because of EPT.

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux