On Thu, 24 Nov 2022 12:32:45 +0900 Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Folks, how do we want to proceed with this? One of the hunks here > conflicts with https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221119001536.2086599-2-nphamcs@xxxxxxxxx/ > > Do we want to remove conflicting hunk from "[PATCH 1/6] zswap: fix writeback > lock ordering for zsmalloc" and pick this patch up? > The "Implement writeback for zsmalloc" series is clearly due for one or more new versions, so I will drop that series and I will apply "zswap: do not allocate from atomic pool". Let's ask Nhat Pham to prepare future revisions of the "Implement writeback for zsmalloc" series against mm-unstable.
