On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 06:11:55PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > With CONFIG_SLUB_TINY we want to minimize memory overhead. By lowering > the default slub_max_order we can make slab allocations use smaller > pages. However depending on object sizes, order-0 might not be the best > due to increased fragmentation. When testing on a 8MB RAM k210 system by > Damien Le Moal [1], slub_max_order=1 had the best results, so use that > as the default for CONFIG_SLUB_TINY. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/6a1883c4-4c3f-545a-90e8-2cd805bcf4ae@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx> Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@xxxxxxxxx> Thanks!
